CONTINUOUS INTERNET TELEMETRY24H DRIFT64,077 material changesacross 62,304 domains · 24h to ~4h ago · +29,460 vs yesterdayROTATION56 domains moved DNS from koaladns.com to magpiedns.com, 56 moved backa rotation loop, not a migration · 24hNOW537 curated domains not reachablelast probe, steadySITE ERRORS33,772 sites serving errorslast probe · 5xx / 404 / TLSBOT DEFENSEbot defense observed on 121,513 sites429 rate-limit / 403 bot-block, a posture signal

zfanw.com

Observed Aug 2, 2026, 19:20 UTC (3d ago). Every field below was attested with an Ed25519 signature at scan time.

This reading of zfanw.com was taken 3d ago

zfanw.com is on the survey sweep, which works its way across the whole catalog rather than returning to one name on a schedule. Putting zfanw.com under watch moves it to the fast lane, where DomainDrift re-checks it about every 5 minutes and signs each reading, so a change becomes a dated event within minutes instead of waiting for the sweep to come round.

Watch zfanw.com Watching a domain needs a DRM3 account. The reading above stays free and public either way.
Up right now
Secured byGoDaddy.com
domcop
Every line above is a signed observation. Check the math at the bottom of the page.
EVIDENCE OF WILDCARD DNSobserved 2026-08-05 07:57 UTC

DomainDrift asked this domain for a TXT record at a name nobody registers, and got an answer back. A domain that answers a name that was never created is answering names in general, and that is wildcard DNS.

Wildcard DNS clusters around domain parking, dynamic DNS and catch-all hosting. It is also a real attack surface: if every invented hostname resolves, then a hostname an attacker invents resolves too, which is the ground state for subdomain takeover and for phishing hosted under a name that looks legitimate.

This is evidence of wildcard behaviour, not a proven fact. It rests on one control name: a domain could legitimately serve a TXT record at exactly that name for an unrelated reason, and a wildcard that answers address records but not TXT records would not be caught here at all. What this reading is and is not.

INFRASTRUCTURE MAPwhat zfanw.com actually stands on - every host below is a signed observation
zfanw.com
A / AAAA
76.223.54.14613.248.169.48
unattributedserves the site
NS
ns1.afternic.comns2.afternic.com
afternic.comanswers its DNS
TLS
zfanw.com
GoDaddy.comissued its certificate

DNS Records

A 2

  • 76.223.54.146
  • 13.248.169.48

MX 1

  • 0

TXT 1

  • v=spf1 -all

NS 2

  • ns1.afternic.com
  • ns2.afternic.com

SOA 1

  • ns1.afternic.com dns.jomax.net

MCP_RECORDS 1

  • v=spf1 -all

DMARC_RECORDS 1

  • v=spf1 -all

BIMI_RECORDS 1

  • v=spf1 -all

MTA_STS_RECORDS 1

  • v=spf1 -all

TLS Certificates (4)

Common NameIssuerExpires
zfanw.com C=US, O=GoDaddy.com, CN=GoDaddy TLS Intermediate CA DV - R1v1 Fri, 01 Jan 2027 11:25:32 +0000
GoDaddy TLS Intermediate CA DV - R1v1 C=US, O=GoDaddy.com, CN=GoDaddy TLS Root CA - R1 Fri, 24 Aug 2040 11:59:59 +0000
GoDaddy TLS Root CA - R1 C=US, ST=Arizona, L=Scottsdale, O=GoDaddy.com, Inc., CN=Go Daddy Root Certificate Authority - G2 Thu, 31 Dec 2037 23:59:59 +0000
Go Daddy Root Certificate Authority - G2 C=US, ST=Arizona, L=Scottsdale, O=GoDaddy.com, Inc., CN=Go Daddy Root Certificate Authority - G2 Thu, 31 Dec 2037 23:59:59 +0000

Subdomains (0)

None observed.

The proof

Signed at scan time. Check the math yourself. Every line above is part of one signed observation. Re-hash it and check the Ed25519 signature in your own browser; the only network request the check makes is for the published public keys.

Verify this receipt

Ed25519 Receipt

Receipt ID
rcpt_2e56259c5156582a
Output Hash
854140837c25c54060c88e1154e0b01f83aa424f82db454697663387c28186fd
Signature
ed25519:78da21836e89eb51b50974746024b29a31fe51be376fc52788a010061895f0a257a6291e3887eff360e54b1c06ff6267ec31a01b1e20351fe01ce3b7d8e34500
Public Key
ed25519:4859bb613d650e12dd7478cc307c73a8712fabc115a9dc59f65534ed3c09a8f9
Parent
(genesis)
Plane
fast
Verify this in your browser