CONTINUOUS INTERNET TELEMETRY24H DRIFT68,088 material changesacross 64,935 domains · 24h to ~2h ago · +33,471 vs yesterdayROTATION56 domains moved DNS from koaladns.com to magpiedns.com, 56 moved backa rotation loop, not a migration · 24hNOW538 curated domains not reachablelast probe, steadySITE ERRORS33,857 sites serving errorslast probe · 5xx / 404 / TLSBOT DEFENSEbot defense observed on 123,111 sites429 rate-limit / 403 bot-block, a posture signal

zincwhite.info

Observed Aug 3, 2026, 03:33 UTC (3d ago). Every field below was attested with an Ed25519 signature at scan time.

This reading of zincwhite.info was taken 3d ago

zincwhite.info is on the survey sweep, which works its way across the whole catalog rather than returning to one name on a schedule. Putting zincwhite.info under watch moves it to the fast lane, where DomainDrift re-checks it about every 5 minutes and signs each reading, so a change becomes a dated event within minutes instead of waiting for the sweep to come round.

Watch zincwhite.info Watching a domain needs a DRM3 account. The reading above stays free and public either way.
Not responding
Signed observation on record.
tranco
Every line above is a signed observation. Check the math at the bottom of the page.
EVIDENCE OF WILDCARD DNSobserved 2026-08-05 16:38 UTC

DomainDrift asked this domain for a TXT record at a name nobody registers, and got an answer back. A domain that answers a name that was never created is answering names in general, and that is wildcard DNS.

Wildcard DNS clusters around domain parking, dynamic DNS and catch-all hosting. It is also a real attack surface: if every invented hostname resolves, then a hostname an attacker invents resolves too, which is the ground state for subdomain takeover and for phishing hosted under a name that looks legitimate.

This is evidence of wildcard behaviour, not a proven fact. It rests on one control name: a domain could legitimately serve a TXT record at exactly that name for an unrelated reason, and a wildcard that answers address records but not TXT records would not be caught here at all. What this reading is and is not.

INFRASTRUCTURE MAPwhat zincwhite.info actually stands on - every host below is a signed observation
zincwhite.info
A / AAAA
172.237.129.236172.237.129.108172.237.129.242
unattributedserves the site
NS
ns1.ns306.parklogic.comns2.ns306.parklogic.com
parklogic.comanswers its DNS
MX
mail.eye-mail.net
eye-mail.netreceives its email

DNS Records

A 3

  • 172.237.129.236
  • 172.237.129.108
  • 172.237.129.242

MX 1

  • 1mail.eye-mail.net

TXT 1

  • v=spf1 ip6:fdec:ae16:fda7::/48 -all

NS 2

  • ns1.ns306.parklogic.com
  • ns2.ns306.parklogic.com

SOA 1

  • ns1.parklogic.com hostmaster.zincwhite.info

MCP_RECORDS 1

  • v=spf1 ip6:fdec:ae16:fda7::/48 -all

DMARC_RECORDS 1

  • v=spf1 ip6:fdec:ae16:fda7::/48 -all

BIMI_RECORDS 1

  • v=spf1 ip6:fdec:ae16:fda7::/48 -all

MTA_STS_RECORDS 1

  • v=spf1 ip6:fdec:ae16:fda7::/48 -all

TLS Certificates (0)

None.

Subdomains (0)

None observed.

The proof

Signed at scan time. Check the math yourself. Every line above is part of one signed observation. Re-hash it and check the Ed25519 signature in your own browser; the only network request the check makes is for the published public keys.

Verify this receipt

Ed25519 Receipt

Receipt ID
rcpt_3c9656d3b5c23768
Output Hash
18e79397402a9f3355408097b7be2b47c957c5a8023e4af22cd6e042f89f770e
Signature
ed25519:296afae43fa0397094c9f1b74b9032931fd86f758095a648ed41f9aea25066044c5da42a98c030c9f565174385d473bfa900bbab2bcdfcce3f3cb4d14ce29706
Public Key
ed25519:4859bb613d650e12dd7478cc307c73a8712fabc115a9dc59f65534ed3c09a8f9
Parent
(genesis)
Plane
fast
Verify this in your browser